If the united states is not party to the convention at that time, we will not have a seat at the table to protect against proposed amendments that would roll back convention rights we fought hard to achieve. The united states, unclos, and the race to the arctic. The united states was among the nations that participated in the third united nations conference on the law of the sea, which took place from 1974 through 1982 and resulted in the international treaty known as the united nations convention on the law of the sea unclos. Disputes between states on issues of law of the sea cannot be resolved by a court or tribunal unless both states consent modes of consent. Anniversary united nations convention on the law of the sea. The united nations convention on the law of the sea unclos is an international treaty.
Malone i introduction the united states did not approve the recently completed law of the sea convention, nor will we sign it, because of our objections to the treatys provisions on deep seabed mining. It was the topic of my phd dissertation at the fletcher school. List of parties to the united nations convention on the law of the. United nations conference on the law of the sea, 19731982 third conference. Rosen put great interest in the pending arbitration between. These changes have potential consequences for weather in the united states, access to.
Reflections after 30 years robert beckman and tara davenport1 abstract. Rosen held a lecture on the status of unclos and order at sea. Other states may soon push the law of the sea into new, antithetical directions if the united states does not ratify the treaty. Discussion regarding accession to unclos in the united states. Our rejection of the final convention was an unfortunate. United states and the united nations convention on the law. While the convention addressed and codified various high seas freedoms, enjoyment of those freedoms is not conditional on membership.
China argues that the tribunal lacks legal jurisdiction to rule in the case. This does not preclude a party from entering into, or authorizing arrangements for leases, licenses, joint ventures and technical assistance programmes in. Furthermore, article 91 2 of unclos requires that flag states not only register ships but t o issu e r egistered vessels with documentation to prove registrati on and nationality. As a result, the united states remains off the list of 168 state parties to unclos, a list which includes all other major maritime powers such as russia and china. United nations convention on the law of the sea unclos. Non accession to unclos and the doctrine of innocent. The flexibility of the definition of terms used to describe the various maritime zones speaks clearly for an independent relation between the 2001 convention and unclos. The united states, unclos, and the race to the arctic the persistent resistance of the united states to the united nations law of the. China, the us, and the law of the sea openedition journals.
The united states, unclos, and the race to the arctic skemman. A different situation may present itself in case of wrecks of state vessels and aircraft. Declarations or statements upon unclos ratification. Unclos, but at the same time does not exclude any other international law applied by states not party to unclos and objecting to this latter. States in the high seas which are rights to claim non. Security council and the only arctic nation that is not a party to the treaty, which has been endorsed by 161 countries. It has declined to participate in the proceedings and has said. This is why the united states operates consistent with even though the u. Peru v chile maritme dispute peru not party to unclos. Also, since the us is not party to unclos, dispute resolution would be through the panels established by article 31, not through unclos tribunals which might otherwise be possible between canada and mexico, as per 31. There are many reasons why accession to unclos would not advance u. The united nations convention on the law of the sea. Arctic interests and the role of unclos by lieutenant colonel matthew reiley.
Nicaragua v honduras nicaragua not a party to unclos until 2000 3. The law of the sea has played a central role in my professional life. Challenges to unclos and order at sea on may, mark e. It is hard to compel states to arbitrate their territorial disputes, and the transnational system does not have the power to hold states accountable for mistakes. No new agreements were concluded at the conference. Most of the provisions in unclos were developed over centuries through their practice and recognition in the. See also bederman, supra note 9, at 126 explaining that the united states signed, but did not ratify, unclos since most of the provisions are part of customary international law. United nations convention on the law of the sea contents page. States with respect to wrecks of states which are not party to the convention, or otherwise interfere with the rights and obligations, including navigational rights and jurisdiction over flag states of such states, beyond that provided under customary international law as reflected in unclos. Declarations and statements article 309 does not preclude a state, when signing, ratifying or acceding to this convention, from making declarations or statements, however phrased or named, with a. Arbitration case between the philippines and china under. The bush administration has renewed its 2004 request that the senate ratify the united nations convention on the law of the sea unclos. Although china is a party to unclos, which is committed to the provisions of the law of the sea, it nevertheless claims its rights in the scs under the historic rights concept, as well.
The convention comes open for amendment for the first time in november of this year. Senate foreign relations committee began a sequence of public hearing concerning whether the united sates should accede to unclos. Romania v ukraine maritime boundary ukraine 298 declaration 5. Given that the united states has not ratified unclos. The convention was opened for signature on 10 december 1982 and entered into force on 16 november 1994 upon deposition of the 60th instrument of ratification. It is not clear whether the united states, as a nonstate party, can even make a. States may choose any one of four dispute settlement venues established under unclos, including the international tribunal for the law of the sea, the. Ships of all nations enjoy the right of innocent passage through the territorial sea. A sound understanding of its key principles and implications was important throughout my time. Record low extents of arctic sea ice over the past decade have focused scientific and policy attention on links to global climate change and projected icefree seasons in the arctic within decades.
Senate has yet to provide its advice and consent the united nations convention on the law of the sea law of the sea convention, which reflects customary international law with respect to traditional uses of the ocean. The law of the sea system of institutions maxplanckinstitut. The convention creates the international seabed authority isa and an attendant international bureaucracy. China is a party to unclos, but the united states is not. The united states is the only permanent member of the u. Ocean sovereignty, sovereign rights and jurisdiction over large areas of the arctic ocean interpretation of unclos commitment to the law of the sea to confirm rights and obligations in arctic ocean.
Declarations and statements article 309 does not preclude a state, when signing, ratifying or acceding to this convention, from making. United nations convention on the law of the sea nmma. Legal remarks on the independence of the 2001 convention. In addition to may benefits enjoyed by states parties under the 1982 unclos, they also have some obligations. Unclos provides a comprehensive legal framework governing all activities and uses of the worlds seas and oceans. Although the united states participated in the negotiations that culminated in the united nations convention on the law of the sea unclos, which came into force in 1994, it has not yet ratified the treaty. Why the united states needs to join unclos the national. This paper will analyze the specific legal regime in part v of unclos to determine whether it has created a certain and predictable regime which has withstood the test of time. Strict obligations for flag states to regulate and enforce. The united nations convention on the law of the sea unclos is the international agreement that resulted from the third united nations conference on the law of the sea unclos iii, which took place between 1973 and 1982.
United nations headquarters, new york, 22 to24 september 1982. The united nations convention on the law of the sea unclos is the international. The flexibility of the definition of terms used to describe the various maritime zones speaks clearly for an independent relation between the. The united nations convention on the law of the sea unclos was adopted in 1982 in montego bay, jamaica and entered into force on 16 november 1994.
The united states and the law of the sea after unclos iii. If a state party does not make a declaration under article 287, the default dispute settlement procedure is arbitration through annex vii of the unclos treaty. The law of the sea in the arctic potsdam summer school. Nicaragua v columbia maritime boundary columbia not party to unclos 4. The united states also participated in the subsequent negotiations of modifications to the treaty from 1990 to 1994. Although not a party to unclos, the united states acts in accordance with the. The parties shall not authorize third states and international organizations or vessels of such states and organizations to carry out any of the activities referred to in paragraph 2. List of parties to the united nations convention on the. United nations conference on the law of the sea convened to consider the topics of the breadth of the territorial sea and fishery limits, which had not been agreed upon in the 1958 conventions. It is possible for a state not party to unclos to join the 2001 convention. Neither the united states nor any other nation need be party to unclos to exercise them. As per article 4 of the agreement, following adoption of the agreement any. The united states has a policy of operating consistent with the convention, but has not ratified it and is not a party to it.
Accession to convention on the law of the sea unnecessary. States has a lengthy history of continental shelf disputes, including. Accession to convention on the law of the sea unnecessary to advance arctic interests. Although the united states has not ratified the convention, the u. The legal nature of coastal states rights in the maritime areas. The united nations convention on the law of the sea of 10.
136 862 608 1327 488 763 1455 100 1368 491 1463 37 694 172 1224 1342 823 1432 905 174 342 795 930 847 1514 1085 1092 787 1325 625 1105 926 881 798 1410 444 698 320 1149 393 1214 1110 1087 1018 1020